Focuses on the financial well-being of artisans through market access, income generation, and supportive infrastructure.

a - Market Access and Visibility

Limited reach to broader markets restricts potential growth.

b - Fair Pricing and Income

Artisans often receive below-value compensation.

c - Access to Financial Support

Lack of formal banking and credit access affects growth.

d - Infrastructure and Workspace

Inadequate facilities hinder productivity and collaboration.

e - Monitoring and Data Collection

Absence of records limits planning and policy targeting.

f - Entrepreneurship and Value Addition

Limited capacity for artisans to innovate or convert embroidery into diversified product lines and services.

g - Supply Chain and Logistics

Poor transportation and material flow infrastructure limit consistent production and delivery.

h - Access to Government Schemes

Awareness and utilization of schemes like NRLM, ODOP, and PM Vishwakarma Yojana are low among artisan households.

Addresses protection, recognition, and promotion of the craft’s traditional and spiritual value.

a - Cultural Preservation Efforts

Oral traditions, rituals, and iconography related to Kapdaganda remain largely undocumented and at risk.

b - Legal Protection and GI Tag Awareness

While Kapdaganda now enjoys GI Tag status, most community members are unaware of the legal or commercial benefits it offers.

c - Storytelling and Cultural Branding

The rich symbolic language of the embroidery remains under-utilized in storytelling, branding, and education.

d - Inclusion in Tourism Circuits

The craft and its community are not yet integrated into tourism routes or tribal eco-cultural destinations.

e - Cultural Event Participation and Representation

Artisan involvement in cultural fairs, heritage festivals, and tribal art conclaves remains minimal.

f - Archival and Museum Inclusion

Few pieces of Kapdaganda embroidery are represented in national or state museum collections, and digital archiving is absent.

Focuses on continuous learning, skill upgradation, and leadership creation within the artisan ecosystem.

a - Skill Development Programs

Existing training is sporadic and lacks structured follow-ups.

b - Design Innovation

Modern aesthetics are yet to be meaningfully integrated into traditional motifs.

c - Leadership and Mentorship Development

Few avenues exist to groom local artisan leaders capable of guiding community clusters.

d - Trainer and Master Artisan Networks

The region lacks structured master trainer networks that could ensure standardized skill transmission.

e - Business and Soft Skills Training

Artisans have limited access to training in negotiation, time management, communication, and pricing.

f - Monitoring and Evaluation

No regular assessments exist to track learning outcomes and productivity improvements post-training.

Focuses on market driven product and design development

a. - Adaptation to Textiles, Paper, Decor

Very limited application beyond shawls and scarves; no formal experimentation.

b. - Originality in Design Forms

Rich in symbolic forms but lacks new compositions or contemporary reinterpretations.

c. - Access to Formal Design Mentorship

No structured access to NIFT/NID or state design bodies; sporadic NGO inputs only.

d. - New Product Development

Few attempts, mostly in stalls or exhibitions; no dedicated product line planning.

e. - Cross-Cultural Inspiration

Minimal exposure to other traditions or market segments that could inspire innovation.

f. - Market Research and Feedback

Artisans rarely collect or apply customer feedback; no formal buyer-designer loops.

Focuses on market driven product and design development

a. - Youth Engagement

Younger generation participation is on a steady decline.

a. - Community Collaboration

Inter-village and artisan group coordination is limited.

c. - Parental and Family Influence on Craft Learning

Intergenerational learning is weakening due to migration and education demands, affecting skill transfer.

d. - Peer Motivation and Role Modeling

Lack of young artisan icons or peer-led motivation initiatives within the community.

e. - Community Festivals and Collective Making

Potential exists to strengthen engagement through community rituals, but these are not strategically used for collaborative production.

Targets physical well-being, eco-conscious production, and improved working environments.

a. - Health and Ergonomic Practices

Crafting conditions are ergonomically unsafe, leading to long-term musculoskeletal and vision issues.

b. - Sustainable Practices

Some adoption of eco-friendly materials is emerging, but widespread implementation is still limited.

c. - Access to Health and Social Security Services

Artisans lack regular access to health checkups, insurance, and welfare schemes specific to unorganized labor.

d. - Workplace Sanitation and Safety

Many artisans work in home-based settings without adequate lighting, ventilation, or cleanliness.

e. - Climate-Responsive Working Conditions

Seasonal disruptions (heat, monsoon) impact comfort, output, and safety, especially for hill-based artisans working without insulation or shade.

f - Storage and Display Solutions

Poor or absent storage and display facilities

g - Availability of Tools & Materials

Inferior quality local tools and materials

h - Dedicated Workspaces

Nonexistent communal or dedicated workspaces

Concerns the ability of artisans to engage with the digital economy and influence policies.

a. - Digital Literacy and Online Presence

Use of digital tools and social media is minimal.

b. - Policy Advocacy and Representation

Artisans lack direct involvement in policy formulation.

c. - Access to Digital Infrastructure

Inconsistent mobile networks, lack of devices, and poor digital infrastructure limit participation.

d. - E-commerce Readiness and Training

Artisans are not trained or supported to use digital platforms for selling their products.

e. - Content Creation and Language Accessibility

There is a scarcity of digital content (videos, tutorials, forms) in Odia or local tribal languages, making tools less accessible.

Deals with functional literacy, integration of traditional wisdom, and institutional knowledge sharing.

a. - Functional Literacy and Education Access

Literacy rates among older artisans are low, limiting their ability to engage with formal systems.

b. - Traditional Knowledge

Craft heritage and tribal epistemologies are missing from school syllabi and formal education modules.

c. - Research and Knowledge Exchange

Collaboration with academic institutions remains limited, leading to underutilization of community knowledge.

d. - Skill-based Vocational Learning in Schools

Local schools rarely offer hands-on skill development related to crafts, leaving a disconnect between education and livelihood.

e. - Artisan-Led Community Learning Circles

Informal peer-to-peer and elder-to-youth teaching models exist but are not supported or institutionalized.

f - Language Inclusion and Multilingual Learning Tools

Lack of localized Odia/tribal language learning materials creates barriers to inclusive educational outreach.

Explores how changing environmental patterns affect livelihoods and encourages ecological stewardship.

a - Impact of Climate on Livelihoods

Agricultural dependence makes artisans vulnerable to climate shifts.

b - Eco-friendly Resource Use

Some initiatives promote local, sustainable material use.

c - Environmental Education and Stewardship

Environmental knowledge is not fully linked to the craft.

d - Waste Management and Resource Efficiency

There are no systems for managing embroidery-related waste like scrap fabric or thread, nor is resource use monitored.

e - Climate Adaptation Awareness

There is limited understanding among artisans of climate risks and adaptation practices, such as water harvesting or shade-based workspaces.

f - Forest and Biodiversity Coexistence Practices

Although the community lives in and depends on forests, structured involvement in conservation programs is minimal.

Skill and Design Development

Workshops, residencies, and tie-ups with design institutes can bring technical innovation while respecting cultural roots.

Digital Platforms

Online presence can help artisans reach national and global audiences, reducing dependence on middlemen.

Policy and Government Schemes

Leverage schemes like NRLM, TRIFED, ODOP, and PM Vishwakarma Yojana.These schemes provide funding, training, and marketing support, but require localized access facilitation for full impact.

Eco-tourism Integration

Embedding craft experiences within tourism itineraries can create immersive encounters for visitors, enhancing appreciation and offering direct income streams to artisans.

Global Craft Networks

Cross-border collaborations and recognition can increase the prestige and demand for Kapdaganda, opening new cultural diplomacy channels.

Climate Adaptation and Sustainability

The eco-friendly nature of the craft aligns well with climate-conscious markets; promoting this linkage can attract green patrons and funding.

Cultural Erosion

As younger generations move toward urban lifestyles, the deeper spiritual meanings and ceremonial roles of Kapdaganda risk being lost or commodified.

Market Exploitation

Without strong institutional protection, imitation products and unfair pricing by traders threaten artisan sustainability and authenticity of the craft.

Environmental Uncertainty

Since most artisans depend on farming as a primary income, irregular rains and crop failure can reduce time and income available for embroidery work.

Migration and Displacement

Young people migrating for work or education often leave traditional skills behind, weakening community knowledge transmission.

Technology Gaps

The lack of smartphones, internet connectivity, and digital training tools keeps artisans from accessing new platforms, opportunities, and knowledge.

Policy Gaps

Despite the existence of support schemes, ground-level access remains patchy due to bureaucratic hurdles, lack of awareness, and weak handholding.